Differences in the availability of new anti-cancer drugs for Italian patients treated in different regions. Results of analysis conducted by the Italian Society Of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Italy is divided into 20 regions. As a consequence of local autonomy, following marketing authorization by the Italian Medicines Agency, each drug for hospital use is not immediately available, because its approval needs to undergo further steps that can be different among regions. The Italian Society of Medical Oncology conducted the present study to describe the impact of the existence of sub-national pharmaceutical formularies on the disparity of access to new anti-cancer drugs among patients treated in different Italian regions. METHODS: The availability of 8 new anti-cancer drugs at a regional level and the coherence of regional authorizations compared with national authorizations approved by the Italian Medicines Agency were analyzed as of April 2009. RESULTS: Fourteen regions and autonomous province of Trento have a regional pharmaceutical formulary. In most cases, the regional pharmaceutical formularies include the eight analyzed drugs, with therapeutic indications coherent with national marketing authorization indications. Five drugs (bevacizumab, trastuzumab, rituximab, erlotinib, sunitinib) were included in all the existing regional pharmaceutical formularies, without restrictions, whereas three drugs (cetuximab, sorafenib, pemetrexed) were found to have restrictions in some regions. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of multiple hierarchical levels of drug evaluation creates a potential element of disparity in the access to pharmacological therapies for Italian citizens.

Does hormone treatment added to radiotherapy improve outcome in locally advanced prostate cancer?: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: To quantify the magnitude of benefit of the addition of hormone treatment (HT) to exclusive radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer, a literature-based meta-analysis was conducted. METHODS: Event-based relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived through a random-effect model. Differences in primary (biochemical failure and clinical progression-free survival) and secondary outcomes (cancer-specific survival, overall survival [OS], recurrence patterns, and toxicity) were explored. Absolute differences and numbers of patients needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. A heterogeneity test, a metaregression analysis with clinical predictors of outcome, and a correlation analysis for surrogate endpoints were also performed. RESULTS: Seven trials (4387 patients) were gathered. Hormone suppression significantly decreased both biochemical failure (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.82; P<.0001) and clinical progression-free survival (RR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.71-0.93; P=.002), with absolute differences of 10% and 7.7%, respectively, which translates into 10 and 13 NNT. cancer-specific survival (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.83; P<.0001) and OS (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P<.0001) were also significantly improved by the addition of HT, without significant heterogeneity, with absolute differences of 5.5% and 4.9%, respectively, which translates into 18 and 20 NNT. Local and distant relapse were significantly decreased by HT, by 36% and 28%, respectively, and no significant differences in toxicity were found. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone suppression plus radiotherapy significantly decreases recurrence and mortality of patients with localized prostate cancer, without affecting toxicity.

A novel clinical prognostic score incorporating the number of resected lymph-nodes to predict recurrence and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The number of resected lymph-nodes (#RNs) has proven prognostic in breast and colorectal cancer. Here we evaluated its prognostic impact in a series of resected NSCLC patients. METHODS: A panel of established prognostic factors plus (1) #RNs or (2) the ratio between the number of metastatic nodes and #RNs (NR) were correlated to overall- (OS), cancer-specific- (CSS), and disease-free-survival (DFS), using the Cox-model. Risk-classes according to hazard ratios (HR) were generated. Internal and external validation was accomplished. RESULTS: A dataset of 415 resected NSCLC patients was retrieved. At multivariate analysis, #RNs and NR were independent factor for longer OS, CSS and DFS (p<0.0001). Patients with a #RNs>10 (identified optimal cut-off) had a statistically significant OS (p=0.02) and DFS (p=0.0005) benefit. In node-positive patients, a NR<9% significantly correlated with better outcome. Stratification into High-, Medium-, and Low-Risk classes, based on High- (HRFs: stage, N-status, age, #RNs) and Intermediate-Risk Factors (IRFs: sex, grading, histology), efficiently predicted outcomes (p<0.0001). The risk class model performance was externally validated in and independent dataset of 297 patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results contribute to complete the panel of prognostic factors for resected NSCLC. A prospective larger validation and comparison with molecular prognostic tools is warranted.

Trastuzumab plus weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel for locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: preliminary results of a feasibility-phase II study aimed at cardiotoxicity.

A feasibility-phase II study was conducted to assess the cardiotoxicity of weekly trastuzumab, epirubicin, and paclitaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Untreated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive advanced breast cancer received trastuzumab (day 1), and epirubicin (25 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) (day 2) on a weekly basis. The rate of patients with left-ventricular ejection fraction (L-VEF) reduction greater than 10% after 12 weeks was the primary end point. According to a two-stage model, an initial step with 15 patients was required; after 11 patients without toxicity, a second step with 21 patients was planned. After 255 courses in 15 patients (median treatment weeks: 18), the relative dose intensity was 94.7%. At 12 weeks, three patients (20%) displayed a L-VEF reduction greater than 10%, six and six (40%) patients showed a L-VEF reduction < or =10% or no change, respectively. Baseline, -12 weeks, and -24 weeks median L-VEF was 69% (range 61-77), 65% (range 60-76), and 65% (range 55-73), respectively. No EKG/cardiac signs were present. Thirteen patients had grade 3 alopecia and two patients had grade 3 asthenia, in the absence of severe hematological toxicity. Objective responses were observed in 11 patients (73.3%, 95% confidence interval 51.0-95.7), with 10 partial. The weekly administration of trastuzumab-epirubicin-paclitaxel is extremely tolerable, also with regard to L-VEF reduction. These results allowed entrance to the second step of the study.

Magnitude of benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Several randomized trials investigating the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have provided conflicting results. With over 7000 patients included, we analyzed results of 13 reports over the past 10 years in which patients received either platinum-containing chemotherapy or not. The major endpoint was to assess the magnitude of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of the absolute benefit. All phase III randomized trials and meta-analyses published as peer-reviewed papers or as abstracts from 1994 to 2007 were eligible. A literature-based meta-analysis was performed; event-based overall- and disease-free survival (OS/DFS) and Relative Risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived. Magnitudes of benefit were evaluated with: absolute benefit and the number of patients treated for one patient to benefit. Seven sub-populations were examined. Combined effect estimation was computed with fixed- and random-effect models; a heterogeneity test was also applied. Twelve trials plus an individual patient meta-analysis (7334 patients) were gathered; the trials were designed to determine if cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy improves survival over surgery. When data were pooled and plotted, significant differences in favor of chemotherapy were seen in OS in all seven sub-population, with a relative benefit of 7-12% and an absolute benefit ranging from 2.5% to 4.1%. A more significant trend for chemotherapy was found in DFS. No significant heterogeneity was observed for all outcomes and sub-populations. The absolute benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains essentially the same regardless of how data are screened. While significant differences are clearly found in this analysis, the small magnitude of benefit seen with this large population, especially when considering the number of patients needed for one to benefit, raises important issues when weighing risks and benefits of treatment for individual patients.

Trastuzumab cardiotoxicity: biological hypotheses and clinical open issues.

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab has significantly improved the prognosis of breast cancer patients overexpressing the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). This result has been achieved in all disease settings, by increasing overall survival in early stage and advanced disease and by increasing pathological complete responses in neoadjuvant disease. OBJECTIVE: Although the greatest impact of this monoclonal antibody has been seen in the adjuvant setting, by increasing disease-free survival and overall survival rates an increased rate of both symptomatic and non-symptomatic cardiac toxicity has also been observed. METHODS: In the following review, the different mechanisms of trastuzumab cardiac toxicity are described and, in addition, the clinical data coming from both trials and meta-analyses is discussed. RESULTS: While there is strong evidence for the incidence of trastuzumab-related cardiac toxicity, there is still little known on the exact pathogenesis of this toxicity. Interestingly, both experimental and clinical data suggest that trastuzumab may sensitize cardiomyocytes to injuries and stress from administration of anthracyclines. This has led to a proposed novel mechanism of cardiotoxicity that appears to be quite different from the anthracycline-associated cardiotoxicity. Trastuzumab does not seem to cause any overt ultrastructural abnormality; it does, however, lead to myocardial dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Most of the proposed hypotheses seems to be related to the activity of trastuzumab in interfering with the ERBB-2 receptor. Indeed, data from clinical trials in the adjuvant setting report increased cardiac toxicity in those patients who previously received anthracyclines.

Taxanes as primary chemotherapy for early breast cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: In patients with locally advanced and operable breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been demonstrated to increase the chance of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) when compared with adjuvant treatment; moreover, patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) have a better outcome. A literature-based meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to 'weigh' how much taxanes add to anthracyclines as primary treatment over standard chemotherapy was conducted. METHODS: Event-based relative risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were derived through both a fixed-effect and a random-effect model; a heterogeneity test was applied as well. Absolute differences (AD) and the number (of patients) needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. Primary endpoints were: 1) pCR rate and 2) BCS rate. A sensitivity analysis of 3 subgroups according to taxane strategies was conducted. RESULTS: Data for primary endpoints were available for 7 RCTs (2455 patients). The rate of BCS was significantly higher for patients receiving taxanes, with an AD of 3.4% (P = .012), which translates into 29 patients NNT, without significant heterogeneity. The rate of pCR was higher for patients receiving taxanes, although not statistically significant. In the sensitivity analysis, patients receiving taxanes as a sequential schedule had a significant higher probability to achieve pCR, with an AD of 2.4% (P = .013), which translates into 41 patients NNT, without significant heterogeneity. Patients receiving taxanes as a concomitant schedule had a significantly higher probability to achieve BCS, with an AD of 5.3% (P = .027), which translates into 19 patients NNT, without significant heterogeneity. The complete response rate was significantly higher in the taxane arms, regardless of the adopted strategy, with an AD ranging from 6.7% to 15.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of taxanes and anthracyclines as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer improves the chance of achieving both higher BCS and pCR rates.

Do adjuvant aromatase inhibitors increase the cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer? Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite the advantages from using aromatase inhibitors (AIs) compared with tamoxifen for early breast cancer, an unexpectedly greater number of grade 3 and 4 cardiovascular events (CVAE) (as defined by National Cancer Institute of Canada-Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0] was demonstrated. METHODS: Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing AI with tamoxifen in early breast cancer were considered eligible for this review. The event-based risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived, and a test of heterogeneity was applied. Finally, absolute differences (ADs) in event rates and the number of patients needed to harm 1 patient (NNH) were determined. RESULTS: Seven eligible RCTs (19,818 patients) reported CVAE results. When considering all RCTs, the AD of the primary endpoint (CVAE) between the 2 arms (0.52%), tamoxifen versus AI, was statistically significant (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60; P= .007). This translated into an NNH value of 189 patients; when only third-generation AIs were considered, the difference (0.57%) remained significant (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.63; P= .0038). Thromboembolic events were significantly more frequent in the tamoxifen arm, regardless of the strategy adopted (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.65; P< .0001), without significant heterogeneity (P= .21). An AD of 1.17% and an NNH value of 85 patients were observed. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results from this meta-analysis, the risk of grade 3 and 4 CVAEs in patients who were receiving AIs was higher compared with the risk in patients who were receiving tamoxifen, and the difference reached statistical significance. However, the AD was relatively low, and from 160 to 180 patients had to be treated to produce 1 event.

Cardiotoxicity and incidence of brain metastases after adjuvant trastuzumab for early breast cancer: the dark side of the moon? A meta-analysis of the randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: In five randomized clinical trials (RCTs), adjuvant trastuzumab (T) for early stage breast cancer with human epidermal growth-factor receptor-2 over-expression/gene-amplification has shown to decrease the risk of both recurrence and death. The issue regarding the long-term safety profile of such drug is still open; in particular, questions remain about long-term cardiotoxicity, and specific patterns of relapse such as brain metastases (BM). In order to quantify the magnitude of these two risks, and then balance those with the survival outcome, a literature-based meta-analysis was performed. METHODS: All phase III trials were considered eligible. A literature-based meta-analysis was accomplished, and event-based relative risk ratios with 95% confidence interval were derived. A fixed- and a random-effect model according to the inverse variance and the Mantel-Haenzel method were applied. Heterogeneity test was applied as well. Absolute differences (AD) and the Number of patients Needed to Treat or to Harm (NNT/NNH) were calculated. Safety end-points were: (1) Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) grade III-IV rate, (2) Significant reduction of left-ventricular-ejection-fraction (L-FEV) rate and (3) BM rate. In order to quantify the magnitude of the significant benefit already found in the original RCTs, Efficacy end-points were: (1) disease-free survival (DFS) and (2) overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Five RCTs were gathered (11,187 patients); at an average 2-years follow-up, all data was available for the safety and efficacy end-points, while three RCTs reported results for BM analysis (6,738 patients). When considering RCTs with trastuzumab administered for 1 year, a significant increased risk of grade III-IV Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) was found in the T-arm, with an AD of 1.61% (p < 0.00001), which translates into 62 treated patients required to harm one (NNH). When considering the asymptomatic L-FEV reduction, a significant increased risk of grade significant L-FEV reduction was found in the T-arm, although significantly heterogeneous, with an AD of 7.20% (p < 0.00001), which translates into 14 NNH. The incidence of BM was significantly higher in the T-arm, without significant heterogeneity, with an AD of 0.62 (p = 0.033), which translates into 161 NNH. The DFS, DDFS, and OS were significantly better in the T-arm, with an AD of 6.00, 4.80 and 1.96%, which translates into 16, 21 and 51 NNT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall outcome results show that trastuzumab is one of the most important discoveries in oncology. Nevertheless, the biological activity of trastuzumab needs to be investigated more extensively to explore both long-term safety and specific relapse patterns.

Weekly epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in previously untreated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

We conducted a phase II study to determine the activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin-paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients untreated for metastatic disease. The phase II study was designed following the Simon optimal-two stage method. Patients received epirubicin 25 mg/m and paclitaxel 80 mg/m every week, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on days 2 and 4 for 24 consecutive weeks in the absence of progression. From 1999 to 2004, 53 patients entered the study; 1093 weekly courses were delivered, with a median number of cycles of 22. Patients received a median relative dose intensity of 94%. No hematological grade 3-4 toxicities were observed. One patient had one episode of grade 3 mucositis and two patients (3.8%) suffered grade 2 asthenia. Eight patients (15.1%) experienced grade 2 neutropenia, grade 2 anemia was registered in seven patients (13.2%). No cardiotoxicity was observed. Ten out of 53 patients (18.9, 95% confidence interval 8.3, 29.4%) showed a complete response, whereas 28 (52.8, 95% confidence interval 39.4, 66.3%) had a partial response, with an overall response rate of 71.7% (95% confidence interval 59.6, 83.8%). In addition, 14 patients (26.4%) had stable disease. Median time to progression was 12 months (95% confidence interval 7, 17). Median response duration was 14 months (range 3-60). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 90.1, 68.0 and 56.6%, respectively. In untreated metastatic breast cancer patients, the weekly administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support seems to be extremely tolerable and active, and deserves further investigation into a phase III trial.

Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma.

To summarise the advances in the hormonal treatment of post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer, this paper reviews the published literature regarding the randomised trials comparing aromatase inhibitors (AIs) versus tamoxifen as a first-line therapeutic choice, or AIs versus megestrole acetate (MEG) as a second-line option. The pooled analysis of these authors on AI versus MEG as a second-line option for post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer suggested that AIs do not add any significant benefit over MEG in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and time to progression. According to the Cochrane Database, use of an AI as a second-line therapy versus any other endocrine therapy (mostly MEG) has shown a significant benefit in terms of overall survival, but not for progression-free survival, clinical benefit (CB) or ORR. Concerning the authors' comparisons between AIs versus tamoxifen as a first-line endocrine option in post-menopausal women with metastatic breast carcinoma, AIs seem to be superior to tamoxifen, with a significant benefit in terms of ORR, CB and time to progression being observed in favour of AIs over tamoxifen with fixed effects estimates. According to the Cochrane Database, there was an advantage to the use of AIs over tamoxifen in terms of progression-free survival and CB, but not for overall survival or ORR. With regards to toxicity, AIs show similar levels of hot flushes and arthralgia, increased risks of nausea, diarrhoea and vomiting, but a decreased risk of vaginal bleeding and thromboembolic events compared with other endocrine therapies. Weight gain, dyspnoea and peripheral oedema seem to be more frequent with MEG. At present, there is no proved overall survival difference in patients who are treated first with an AI and then with tamoxifen compared with the opposite sequence. In the metastatic setting, results are limited and are based on retrospective analyses.

Gemcitabine-based combinations for inoperable pancreatic cancer: have we made real progress? A meta-analysis of 20 phase 3 trials.

BACKGROUND: Several attempts have been made at improving the efficacy of gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer by combining it with other chemotherapeutic or molecularly targeted agents. However, randomized trials have produced conflicting results. METHODS: All prospective, randomized, phase 3 trials that compared single-agent gemcitabine with gemcitabine-based combinations were considered eligible for the current analysis. A literature-based meta-analysis was performed, event-based relative risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were derived through both a fixed-effect model approach and a random-effect model approach, and overall survival (OS) was explored as the primary endpoint. To estimate the magnitude of the eventual benefit, absolute differences and the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) for 1 patient to benefit were calculated. A sensitivity analysis for OS was performed according to the type of agent used in combination with gemcitabine. RESULTS: Twenty trials that involved 6,296 patients were identified. No significant differences in the primary endpoint were observed in the overall population or in the sensitivity analysis. Conversely, a significant advantage was evident with regard to both progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall response rate (ORR) in the overall population, with an absolute benefit of 2.6% (NTT = 39 patients) and 3.0% (NNT = 33 patients). Platinum combinations led to the greatest absolute benefits for PFS and ORR compared with single-agent gemcitabine (10% and 6.5%, respectively), but this did not result in an OS benefit. Improvement in PFS, but not in the ORR, was correlated with an improvement in OS. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. However, platinum/gemcitabine combinations appeared to improve PFS and the ORR and, thus, may be considered in selected patients.

Peripheral neurotoxicity of weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy: a schedule or a dose issue?

PURPOSE: The rationale for intensification strategies is that more frequent exposure to chemotherapeutics could enhance antitumor activity. Several trials investigated weekly paclitaxel administration, but there are no clear data concerning peripheral neurotoxicity. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of peripheral neurotoxicity in patients affected by advanced breast cancer treated with weekly paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Neurotoxicity was assessed with neurologic and neurophysiologic evaluation before treatment and after 12 weeks and 24 weeks. A total neurotoxicity score was assigned to each patient on the basis of neurophysiologic and neuropathic signs and symptom changes. Seventeen patients entered the study. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, 71% showed moderate clinical and/or neurophysiologic signs of neurotoxicity; after 24 weeks, the incidence of neurotoxicity increased to 96%. Sural amplitude at the 24-weeks examination significantly decreased from basal mean value (13.5 microv, standard deviation [SD] 6 microv vs. 7 microv, SD 5.9 microv, respectively; P = 0.01), whereas median sensory amplitude decreased after 24 weeks from 10.3 microv, SD 6.2 microv to 4.9 microv, SD 3.8 microv (P = 0.001). In a subset of 11 patients, we obtained a follow-up examination after 6 months from the end of treatment. In all patients, examined signs and symptoms of neurotoxicity improved with recovery of subjective neuropathic symptoms and neurophysiologic findings. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate, in a little population of patients evaluated with a comprehensive neurologic assessment, that weekly paclitaxel is related to a very high incidence of peripheral neurotoxicity. Follow-up data obtained in a subset of patients indicate that peripheral neurotoxicity is reversible.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin must be considered the treatment standard for lung cancer chemotherapy, whatever the disease setting, at least in the Western world. After the seminal meta-analysis published in 1995, 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) exploring the benefits of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy have been completed, published, or presented. Although all these RCTs differ in patient features, two common suggestions emerge when the stage is taken into account: a significant benefit for chemotherapy is demonstrated for stage II and IIIA patients and none of these trials showed any significant benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB patients. Ten years after this meta-analysis, a further individual patient data-pooled analysis exploring the eventual benefits of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after surgery for early stage non-small cell lung cancer in the more recent RCTs has been presented. The 5-year overall survival benefit in favor of cisplatin-based chemotherapy was 5.3% (48.8% versus 43.3%, p = 0.004), with a relative risk reduction of 11%. These results confirm those reported by previous meta-analyses performed according to a literature-based approach. Advances are emerging in the selection of those patients who are likely to benefit more from such treatment. In this respect, the customized therapy based on molecular/genetic patient and disease features constitutes a new avenue to pursue.

Troponin-T and myoglobin plus echocardiographic evaluation for monitoring early cardiotoxicity of weekly epirubicin-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Increased serum level of troponin-T and myoglobin has been recently reported to be related to cumulative anthracycline exposure. Left ventricular ejection fraction seems accurate in monitoring systolic function according to the latest version of Toxicity Criteria by chemotherapeutics 3.0. From January 2002, 20 patients with untreated advanced breast cancer received epirubicin (25 mg/m/week) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m/week) for 24 weeks. Troponin-T, myoglobin and biochemical serum enzymes circulating levels were measured immediately before and 4 h after epirubicin administration every week. Patients underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24. The number of courses administered was 352 (median 18, range 4-24). Epirubicin median dose administered was 600 mg/m and paclitaxel median dose administered was 1760 mg/m. Troponin-T never overcame the upper normal limit; one patient experienced troponin-T elevation without any clinical or instrumental sign of cardiac failure. Myoglobin never significantly increased with the exception of a patient who underwent several abdominal fluid drainages. Creatine kinase MB and C-reactive protein never moved outside the upper normal limit. No symptomatic cardiac event was recorded. In 55 performed echocardiograms at weeks 0, 8, 16 and 24, neither left ventricular ejection fraction nor early peak flow/atrial flow velocity registered any significant decrease. No troponin-T or myoglobin serum elevations and Left ventricular ejection fraction/early peak flow/atrial flow velocity changes were registered in our series of nonsymptomatic women during epirubicin/paclitaxel weekly chemotherapy in the absence of clinical cardiac toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed, however, to understand whether the troponin-T or myoglobin circulating level measurement is able to detect subclinical, early-stage doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Is recurrent venous thromboembolism after therapy reduced by low-molecular-weight heparin compared with oral anticoagulants?

PURPOSES: To evaluate whether the incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) events after therapy differs for patients treated with long-term low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT). METHODS: All randomized studies were searched through computerized queries of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, the American Society of Hematology abstract database, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstract database. RESULTS: Eleven studies including 2,907 patients were identified. Seven studies evaluated a period of 3 to 9 months after cessation of the allocated treatment: 5.4% of patients in the LMWH group vs 4% in the arm allocated to OAT had an episode of recurrent symptomatic VTE. Combined analysis showed a nonsignificant trend in lowering recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of OAT (relative risk [RR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 2.02; p = 0.27). By contrast, during active treatment, a statistically significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH over OAT was registered (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.83; p = 0.001). Regarding cancer patients only, 37 of 569 patients (6.5%) in the LMWH group had recurrent symptomatic VTE vs 69 of 546 patients (12.6%) in the OAT group, with a statistically significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.76; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant reduction of the risk of recurrent symptomatic VTE in favor of LMWH over OAT during treatment, patients treated with long-term LMWH do not seem to have more frequently recurrent VTE events compared with OAT after cessation of therapy. The significant difference favoring LMWH over OAT among all patients receiving treatment comes mostly from studies enrolling cancer patients.

Ten years of experience with weekly chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Weekly chemotherapy administration represents an emerging option for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In order to identify clinical and biological prognostic factors for outcome, we performed a multivariate analysis in a 10-year experience of weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. The original databases of phase II trials of metastatic breast cancer patients who had undergone first-line weekly chemotherapy were collected. Clinical and biological covariables were screened for a possible relationship with time to progression and overall survival in a Cox model. From 1990 to 2003, 184 patients were enrolled in three consecutive phase II studies, to evaluate activity and tolerability of weekly epirubicin with lonidamine or vinorelbine or paclitaxel. All patients were evaluable for clinical variables; histological samples were available in 40 patients. At a median follow-up of 24 months, median time to progression was 9 months (95% confidence interval 8-10) and median overall survival was 34 months (95% confidence interval 24-42). Independent variables were response (hazard ratio 2.34, P<0.0001), receptor status (hazard ratio 1.62, P=0.01) and performance status (hazard ratio 2.31, P<0.0001) for time to progression, and response (hazard ratio 1.86, P=0.005), performance status (hazard ratio 2.81, P<0.0001), dominant metastatic site (hazard ratio 2.27, P<0.0001) and enrollment period (hazard ratio 2.51, P=0.001) for overall survival. Although no biological factors were entered into the Cox model owing to the small sample size, some subpopulations showed a negative trend in survival. In our series of patients who had undergone weekly chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, independent prognostic factors for survival improvement were responders, performance status 0-1, nonvisceral dominant metastatic site and enrollment period. A greater sample population is needed to extensively screen for biological prognostic factors.